Tuesday, February 28, 2006

[ X + Y ] Citizen Cyborg, (Part 1)



The basic book to understand WHY transhumanism school of thinking is so fascinating, is Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redisigned Human of the Future by James Hughes. In this first part, I will post the introduction to the book, just to let you know what it's all about. In the next post, I'll try to write down a review about Hughes's thesis, which I found very interesting but still criticizable.



INTRODUCTION
In the next fifty years, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, genetic engineering and other technologies will allow human beings to transcend the limitations of the body. Life spans will extend well beyond a century. Our senses and cognition will be enhanced. We will have greater control over our emotions and memory. Our bodies and brains will be surrounded by and merged with computer power. We will use these technologies to redesign ourselves and our children into varieties of “posthumanity.”
In Citizen Cyborg James Hughes argues that “transhuman” technologies that push the boundaries of humanness can radically improve our quality of life if they are safe and made equally available in a liberal society. In this groundbreaking work of social commentary, Hughes argues that the biopolitical challenges of the coming transhuman century require a return to the root principles of democracy -- the liberty, equality and solidarity of persons.
The prospect that we ordinary humans will have to coexist with enhanced humans or posthumans understandably terrifies many people. Now a loose coalition of groups has emerged to oppose the use of genetics to enhance human beings. This coalition is politically diverse, including religious conservatives, disability rights and environmental activists, and leftist critics of biotechnology. Bioethicists have often fed those fears, generating many fanciful scenarios relying heavily on old horror movies.
Technophobe ascendance reached its apogee with the appointment of the conservative philosopher Leon Kass, an opponent of in-vitro fertilization, stem cell research and life extension, to head the President’s Council on Bioethics. In 2002 Francis Fukuyama, a conservative intellectual and a Kass appointee to the Bioethics Commission, published Our Posthuman Future, which argued for banning enhancement technologies. In 2003 the President's Council on Bioethics published its critique of human enhancement, Beyond Therapy, and Bill McKibben published Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age, a leftish critique of human enhancement.
In the opposite corner a loose "transhumanist" coalition is mobilizing in defense of human enhancement. Transhumanists argue that human beings should be guaranteed a right to “morphological freedom,” the freedom to control their own bodies and brains, and to use technology to transcend human limitations. For instance Gregory Stock argued in 2002 in Redesigning Humans: Our Inevitable Genetic Future that there are no serious concerns with human genetic enhancement, and that the transhuman future is destined to be bright. Many transhumanists are free-market libertarians, skeptical of regulation and public provision.
Rejecting the two extremes of bioLuddism and libertarian transhumanism, Citizen Cyborg argues for a third way, democratic transhumanism. The democratic transhumanist approach argues that we achieve the best possible posthuman future when we ensure technologies are safe, make them available to everyone, and respect the right of individuals to control their own bodies.
Written for a general audience, Citizen Cyborg takes apart the anxieties of the technophobes and shows that they are inconsistent with democratic values. For instance, while Fukuyama argues that human rights depend on an unchanging “human nature,” Dr. Hughes discusses animals, embryos, the brain-dead, artificial intelligence and posthumans to argue that democratic rights are based on our capacities for thought and feeling. While religious and secular conservatives insist that all human bodies should have rights, whether they have minds or not, Dr. Hughes argues that only persons have rights, not humans.
The democratic transhumanist perspective of Citizen Cyborg provides answers for many pressing “biopolitical” issues, including genetic patents, human genetic engineering, cloning, sex selection, drugs, and assisted suicide.
Citizen Cyborg concludes with a concrete agenda to make sure these technologies make life better for everyone, including expanding and deepening human rights, reforming genetic patent law, and providing everyone with healthcare and a basic guaranteed income.

---
To read the italian version of this intro, please click HERE.
The book is published by Westview Press and it cost $26.35.
ISBN 0-8133-4198-1

Monday, February 27, 2006

014 . Feb Playlist

Hello everybody, since the albums I would like to talk about are too many, I decided it's easier to post my playlist each month. I'll start with the one of February, just to impress you with some unexpeced record.
Of course I'm absolutely not giving up with indepth comments on specific records suitable to 5inDUSTries.

FEB PLAYLIST

1. Maximo Park - A Certain Trigger
2. Placebo - Meds
3. Canaan - Blue Fire
4. Ianva - Disobbedisco!
5. Infernal Poetry - Beholding The Unpure
6. Idaho - The Lone Gunman
7. Iszoloscope - The Audient Void
8. Metallspürhunde - Blut und Spiele
9. Rachel's - The Sea And The Bells
10. Keen - Keen

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

013 . From Hollow



Just a brief note for one of the most interesting project I heard recently. Iszoloscope, this is the name of this one man band, devoted to the outstanding beauty of logic chaos. The album is an excellent mix of never-heard-before esoteric ambient + jungle + industrial + power noise.
Excellent music for damaged ears!

At THIS page you can listen a sample for every track of this masterpiece, The Audient Void.

012 . Copyright at the dead end

>> Note inedite su copyright e copyleft <<

This is a very intriguing article, written by Wu Ming, about why copyright should NOT exist anymore, or at least redefine itself. Unfortunately, it's written in italian language only. Sorry guys, this time I couldn't find any translation (maybe they have it on the official Wu Ming site).
Please read it!
Here a little excerpt:

" [...] Prima la fotocopiatrice e l'audiocassetta, poi il videoregistratore e il campionatore, poi il masterizzatore cd e il peer-to-peer, infine le memorie portatili tipo i-Pod... Come si può pensare che sia ancora valida la giustificazione ideologica del copyright, quella che diede forma allo Statute of Anne?
E' chiaro che va tutto rivisto, questo processo cambia faccia, cervello e cuore dell'intera industria culturale! Occorrono nuove definizioni dei diritti di chi crea, di chi produce, di chi mette a disposizione.
Se una "opera dell'ingegno" può giungere al pubblico senza la mediazione di un editore, di un discografico, di produttori televisivi o cinematografici, sono questi ultimi a dover interrogarsi su come proseguire, a dover inventarsi qualcosa, a dover ridefinire il proprio ruolo imprenditoriale e la propria ragione sociale. Cercare di mantenere con la minaccia della galera un monopolio che non ha più basi significa imbucarsi in un vicolo cieco, è un comportamento da Ancien Régime, da autocrazia zarista. Per fortuna qualcuno comincia a rendersene conto."